Qubecs AMF Releases Draft Incentive Management Guideline for Financial Institutions | Stikeman

August 2024 · 6 minute read

The Autorité des marchés financiers (“AMF”) recently released a draft version of its Incentive Management Guideline (“Draft Guideline”), which applies to Québec-regulated insurers, financial services cooperatives, trust companies, savings companies and other authorized deposit institutions.

The Draft Guideline supplements the AMF’s Sound Commercial Practices Guideline, drawing on international best practices and the AMF’s own experiences as a regulator. It covers some of the same ground as the CCIR-CISRO working group’s ongoing consultation on incentive risk (in which the AMF plays a leading role), which could eventually result in regulatory duplication or inconsistency for the insurance sector in Québec. No other province has released incentives management guidance.

It should be noted that the Draft Guideline consultation is separate from the AMF’s current, more general consultation on its proposed updated Sound Commercial Practices Guideline.

Released on November 4, 2021, the AMF’s announcement invites public comments, with a submission deadline that has been extended to February 18, 2022.

Background

One of the expectations set out in the Sound Commercial Practices Guideline is that real or potential conflicts of interest be avoided or managed in a way that protects the Fair Treatment of Customers (“FTC”) principle. The Draft Guideline focuses on financial institutions’ incentive arrangements because of their potential, when not carefully designed or managed, to create conflicts of interest. It adds further expectations relating to the management of such arrangements, which arrangements can include:

Performance criteria can be either quantitative (e.g. sales volume) or qualitative (e.g. client satisfaction).

Expectations

The AMF’s expectations fall into four categories, as follows:

While the AMF purports to take a principles-based approach, the Draft Guideline uses language that is more “mandatory” in tone than might have been expected and often appears to require financial institutions to take specific actions in order to achieve the expected outcomes. Throughout the Draft Guideline, the requirements/outcomes are phrased as, for example, “ensure”, “satisfy” and “identify”, rather than, for example, “reasonably designed to” ensure, satisfy or identify.

Governance

The Draft Guideline summarizes the AMF’s governance expectation as follows:

The AMF expects financial institutions’ decision-making bodies to place FTC at the centre of decisions concerning the way incentive arrangements are managed.

The implications of this expectation for directors and officers are set out in some detail in the Draft Guideline.

While the board of directors might normally be expected to set the tone for FTC and provide high-level stewardship, while leaving the day-to-day details of implementation to management, the Draft Guideline creates specific expectations for directors at the operational level:

The AMF’s expectations for senior management include:

Managing incentive arrangements

At the most general level, the Draft Guideline states simply that “the AMF expects incentive arrangements to be managed in a manner that ensures FTC”. However, it elaborates on this expectation in a number of ways:

Identification and assessment of risks of practices that could adversely affect FTC

The AMF expects financial institutions to “identify and regularly assess the risks of practices that could adversely affect FTC arising from incentive arrangements.” Two appendices to the Draft Guideline provide additional detail, as follows:

The identification and assessment of these risks requires:

Quality monitoring

Finally, the AMF expects financial institutions to have controls in place to identify any inappropriate sales or practices related to incentive agreements. This expectation is strongest for incentive arrangements that are most likely to result in practices that adversely affect FTC.

Quality monitoring includes:

Next Steps

As noted above, the comment period closes on February 18, 2022. For further information and instructions for submitting comments, please see the AMF’s November 4, 2021 announcement.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7q7DSrqermV6YvK57y56emqSemsS0e9CunJudk2LAbq3Mn2SrnZyarrSx0mabq5mWqXqqusKepa2hppp6eISRbG1rbl8%3D